By Gene King
KingNewsMedia.com
The setting was most poignant but extremely ironic. There she was–Nancy Reagan–sitting in Statuary Hall of the Capitol Building, listening to various speakers wax poetic about her husband, the 40th President of the United States, Ronald Reagan. As Mrs. Reagan glanced beyond the front rows of personal, family and political friends of her and her husband, she saw a packed rotunda filled with many members of Congress and among them, many of the Democrats that now hold an untouchable vise-grip on Washington, D.C.
Publicly gracious, Mrs. Reagan kept the smile on and offered brief remarks to the audience in attendance to see the unveiling of a seven-foot statue of her husband that will share the room with the likes of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. The former First Lady emphasized her appreciation to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s work in organizing the event and became teary, emotional and for passing moments silence as she struggled to compose herself once she shared the fact the last time she was in the room was for the state funeral of her husband.
I am sure there were many in the room who were also solemn but for an additional reason. In the midst of holding a ceremony to honor the 40th president, they looked at the statue, looked at Mrs. Reagan, set their eyes upon guests and speakers from President Reagan’s administration and realized that in some ways, the unveiling of a statue to honor their hero –and for many the primary influence for careers in politics or public service–was taking place during one of the darkest periods for Republicans and Conservatives is some time.
The irony of it all could not have been greater. Reagan, the Great Communicator– the champion of small government, less intrusive government, lower taxes, an embracer of Faith, individual rights (including speech and gun ownership), an aggressive foe of Liberalism, entitlements and foreign enemies of the nation–was being lauded with a gorgeous statue when the government he once led could not be farther away from what he once stood for and worked hard to achieve.
The Reagan Revolution was real and lasting. President Reagan took a battered Republican Party and reshaped it to his ideals. He took a giant listless population of Democrats unhappy with their party and won them over with economic, social, political and military policies that made sense for them to embrace. He took a nation down on itself and licking wounds from Watergate, inflation, unemployment and humiliation from Iran and excited it again. He made Americans believe in America again. He made the armed forces believe in itself again. He, in effect, breathed new life into the nation and woke it up by shaking it out from its depression, victimized attitude and self-doubt.
The irony of the ceremony could not possibly have been greater. Sworn into office in 1981, one can make a sound case that his ‘revolution’ lingers right into today by all those who champion his ideals and oppose what is going on in the White House and Congress today. But for all intents and purposes, President Reagan’s active legacy in Washington today is basically a withered candlestick with a small, faint flame flickering in a wind that threatens to snuff it out.
I am sure that the contradiction of it all weighed on the minds of many at the ceremony who looked around the room and saw Democrats today who would (and probably do) demonize Mr. Reagan whenever they can do it. Let us not forget that during his presidency, the Democrats aggressively attacked Mr. Reagan for policies, actions and even his thoughts that he shared which in many instances did not take long for him to be proven correct.
Be sure to remember that President Reagan was severely criticised by Democrats for one of his most glorious moments. When he stood at the Berlin Wall and demanded for it to be taken down, Democrats rushed to the media to bash him and call him reckless and warmonger. It was one of the defining moments for one of the greatest American anti-Communists this nation has ever had and the Democrats took that moment to trash him and display their very policy of accommodation, appeasement and weakness on the international stage and with military foes that sunk our standing around the world.
Be sure to remember that President Reagan was soundly attacked by Democrats for calling the Soviet Union “the evil empire” publicly and for clearly stating his intention of doing everything he could do to defeat it without firing a shot. So, he did all he could to fan the flames of democracy in Poland. He built up NATO. He built up the American military and he professed commitment to researching a space defense system that would protect us from incoming Soviet missiles. It became known as the “Star Wars Program” and Democrats mocked it. Soviets shook in their boots. In the end, Reagan won.
President Reagan was also unafraid to praise his country. He was a proud flag-waver and through his enthusiasm generated a country to follow him and exhibit pride again through flags, songs and even red-white-blue apparel. Democrats offered snide remarks. The people loved it. It made them feel good and have hope again. Once again, Reagan won.
The litany of things President Reagan believed in, fought for and accomplished is long and with nearly every single one of them I can counter it with the protests of a Democrat Party that was growing more and more radically liberal–and therefore more and more out-of-touch with Americans as Reagan’s presidency went on. The man was clear on many things including his resolve that he did not trust government. It was, according to him, literally the problem and not the solution. He was clear that he did not support taxes. To Mr. Reagan, the ever-increasing size of taxes served only to keep the government’s control over people and make them nothing more than needy wards of the state who were hooked on handouts. These are the reasons and many more too, that to this day Democrats cannot hide their anger, contempt and sheer disrespect for the man. President Reagan was not only one the most aggressive anti-Communists of the past century, he was also one of the most strident opposers to the Democrat Party too. The fact that he openly and repeatedly shared with Americans the story of why he left the Democrats was just salt in their eyes as well.
It is funny how historical happenings converge. In the shadow of the Reagan years the seeds for a far more liberal Democrat Party–ever bordering on Socialist or even Communist tendencies–were being planted. What we are experiencing today is the reaping. Looking back, Bill Clinton was in the end a moderate Democrat that, I believe connected withthe masses and still enjoys deep popularity because he was not the ultra-liberal ideologue that the current president is and has filled his key positions withtoo. Now, maybe some will say that the only reason why President Clinton was a moderate was because he had no choice and had to work with a Republican Congress. That may very well be true. But a sheer ideologue, like President Barack Obama, would not care about such things. At least President Clinton worked with the situation at hand after an American public became spooked over having an entire government under the control of the Democrat Party and voted in Republicans for balance.
The lack of balance today along with one of the most partisan and liberal governments the country has ever had is what disturbs and worries so many that were in the Statuary Hall for the Reagan dedication. President Obama truly is the anti-Reagan by nearly every conceivable measure. The president has radically increased the size of government–and its cost–to record breaking proportions in a matter of months. The president has given the government more power than ever before in meddling withbusiness and has rapidly moved this bloated and powerful government to more Socialist leanings than ever before as well with the “investment” (some would say taking over) of AIG, General Motors and Chrysler to name a few.
Our current president apologizes for our country so much or offers self-criticism so often to foreign nations that it is embarrassing. Instead of offering why America felt and acted the ways it did over the years, our current president would rather go on apologist tours and practice the same olive-branch and idealist policies from Democrats past that have almost always resulted in motivating our enemies to gain strength and courage to attack us. Can you even imagine President Reagan listening to that?
Many have labeled President nothing more than “Jimmy Carter Two” and they may be right. Normally, I would say several months into anyone presidency is too soon to cement labels and develop a finite decision but the sheer number of moves this president has made in such a short time to grow the size, cost and power of the government is frightening. There are numerous traits the current president and his administration share with the disastrous Carter government and that is frightening too. Both men embrace large government, costly government, entitlement programs, a naive world view of our enemies, a lack of focus and respect for the military and strong defense, a more intrusive government in people’s personal lives and the benefit of having a Congress in their hands to pass whatever they want to push.
We know that in the end, the Carter years had sunk the nation into a pit of economic, social and military molasses. We have, at the very least, nearly four years more of President Obama. One can only hope that that some of that Reagan magic is still around and that there are future leaders who embrace his form of government that will protect that withering flame and transfer it to large and tall candle and make the fire glow strong again. The nation needs it.
A Stimulating Snow Job
KNM Editors Op-Ed
May 20, 2009
As we approach the mid-point of the year, it is becoming increasingly and more painfully clear every day that the “stimulus package” and all its related bills and budgets that were frantically passed in the early days of the new Obama Administration and Democrat-controlled Congress was a monumental example of bad government. I cannot label it a “mistake” or an “error” because it was not at all. The bill that was passed so hurriedly was intentionally approved and signed the way it was. There were no mistakes here. Just what I believe will be proven to become a federal failure of historical proportions.
Do you recall how in the euphoria of Obama's first weeks before and after his inauguration there was a mad dash to write, pass and sign a “stimulus” bill? Do you recall how Obama held press conferences every other day while he was the president-elect and aggressively pushed the outgoing-Congress and incoming-Congress to get the job done as quickly as possible? Do you recall the new president's gloomy, fatalistic and all-too daunting comments in January about how bad things looked and how the nation was on the edge of a cliff ready to drop? Do you recall how a complicit media–overwhelmingly in the pocket of the new president–fawned over him and gave a free pass to practically everything he said and did? Do you recall how the media paid more attention to what the new First Lady wore and if the president's children were going to get a playground on the White House grounds instead of paying attention and dissecting the economic bill being written and passed on Capitol Hill?
Well, here is what we got for it all: a terribly and hastily written bill that contained many pieces of political “pork” (wasteful spending) and extremely short-sighted and amateurish language that provided so many loopholes and vague instructions that it could not possibly have been passed with any real thought. But, of course no real thought was given to it since the bill, several hundred pages long, was not even READ in Congress. To be clear, there were a few members in Congress on both sides who called for calm in passing this package and requested more time to review it. But those folks, in my opinion true heroes in government, were simply shouting in the wilderness. Now, as the summer approaches, we can plainly see this mother-of-all-economic-bills will be a failure simply because of the way it was drafted and passed. The problem is this bill was not a routine bill. Its importance in the history of our nation could not be elevated more. The influence it should have had was enormous. It was to be a solution-provider. It was to be literally a stimulus to get us back on track and moving forward with confidence, focus and motivation. It was to generate jobs, investment, lending and all those great and fundamental things that make an economy work. Instead, we have glaringly bad bill that may, ironically, hurt us more than help us. But, that should not be surprising today since it becomes clearer everyday that our government may be the worst impediment to prosperity in the nation.
All the folks who have complained that our government is seriously over-bloated, out-of-touch, ineffective, corrupt and irresponsible are correct. We are in serious trouble when a new president with such power in Congress along with a party in such control of Washington, D.C. with such backing of a partisan media and approval of the public cannot even pass a meaningful, intellectual, honest and effective bill that we desperately needed. As if we ever needed another example of how power corrupts, we have it here at the worst possible moment. The sheer power and ego that came into play with Congress and the White House experiencing near untouchable control led each to recklessly act without the thought and meaning they promised and so many Americans believed would occur. Among the most glaring failures of the economic stimulus were the minimizing of two critical features that should have actually been two of the most dominating features of the bill.
First and foremost, this bill did practically nothing, zero, I mean nothing for one of the most fundamental components of our economy—small business. How this segment could be so terribly omitted is coming back to haunt the administration and Congress as each day passes because you cannot have a recovery without it. Data and testimony coming in from across the country is showing that small businesses are failing, close-to-failing or doing whatever they can do to survive and ride the storm–including eliminating jobs. The other monumental failures of our government recently–the tons of money given to the largest banks, insurance companies and automakers–have done little if anything for small business. Besides not receiving anything substantial in the stimulus package, small businesses are also dealing with the fact that the “credit crunch” is practically as bad as June nears as it was at the start of the year. The very banks that received obscene amounts of tax money have yet to provide attainable credit to business. Smaller banks that customarily loan to small and mid-sized companies cannot provide loans simply because these banks themselves cannot get the large mega-banks to give them money either.
It is natural to give the large public companies all the attention when it comes to layoffs and they certainly have cut thousands of jobs. But this is a bad habit. What does not get attention is the thousands of jobs lost by smaller companies too. And as this segment continues to falter, more jobs will be cut, offices will close and other businesss relying on those companies will hurt too and do the same and there you have an unending cycle. In addition, the truth is that most of the “work” that will come from the stimulus package will not be for the bulk of small business. Those that will benefit will be those in a select few segments including, surprise, government-related agencies or programs and construction.
And that brings us to the second terrible omission: infrastructure. There may indeed be some jobs and projects generated in construction or related fields but they will not number anything like they should because the stimulus package allocated less than 25 percent of its massive cost to infrastructure. Again, here is another example of how terribly ineffective and hideously clueless our government actually is today. You would think that in this highly-partisan era, one thing that most Americans and politicians could agree on is that our nation’s infrastructure was in need of repair and that there is more than enough work to do and it would be public money well spent to benefit……well, you know the public.
Nope.
There would be more tangible and faster ecomomic results from assigning more money to infrastructure projects than what the bill as written could ever do. Build a bridge, repair a highway, install sound barriers, medians or lights etc. etc. and many more businesses (and therefore people) would benefit. Instead, we have a bill that truly is for the few it seems. In fact, since June is approaching and the stimulus has been passed for months now, it is legitimate and fair to question just where is all this money now. The early “returns” of the bill are coming in and I predict we are just going to see more of the same–a few jobs here and there mainly reserved for agencies, companies and people comfortably entrenched in the system.
As I write this column today, I point to several things today that really represent what this false stimulus bill is all about:
1-The Federal Reserve issued a far-darker economic forecast for the nation than it did in the wake of the passing of the stimulus package. Now, it says the national unemployment rate could hit 9.6 percent. But the Fed has been underestimating the jobless rate for a while now. So, if you take its past predictions, unemployment could hit double-digits. So, again where are the jobs that a stimulus is supposed to generate if we are now facing year without job growth?
2-The Fed also issued a far-gloomier outlook on Gross Domestic Product (GDP)–essentially all the goods and services we produce. Now, the forecast is that the GDP could decrease two percent. It previously predicted a maximum decrease of 1.3 percent. So, let us ask one more time where is the stimulus package’s influence and effect in our nation? We not only have less jobs but less being produced by exisiting business.
3-Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner freely admitted today all the government’s manuevers did nothing to free up credit for small business and provide direct aid. Yet, the largest banks that received aid are making profits and want to return the money back so they indeed have money to lend. Hell, it is our money. Furthermore, the tons of tax funds given to General Motors increasingly seems for naught as more observers belive every day the company will go into bankruptcy–which many called for it to do from the beginning.
4-New Jersey issued some employment data today. New Jersey is important to note because despite being in one of the hardest hit regions in this economy, it retains prominence as one of the wealthiest states in the nation. It is also one of the smallest states in the nation too and best educated so what happens there is a good barometer of where we are and where we are headed. Well, the exodus of jobs continues. The state lost more than 14,000 private sector jobs in April across multiple industries. There was one sector of growth. Yep, it was government. More than 1200 jobs were added to the government ranks and many of those were officially attributed to the stimulus package. Keep in mind New Jersey, one of the smallest states in the country landwise and in population, has one of the most bloated governments in the union and is currently seeking a $2 billion loan.
To me, all of this smacks of history repeating. Many people believe former president Bush wasted a historical chance to do immense good for the country in the aftermath of the brutal attacks of September 11th, 2001. An opportunity to induce change in government for the better and elevate the presidency to more meaning and effectiveness was wasted. I believe President Obama has done the same exact thing. People typically forget President Bush, like Obama, came into office labeling himself an outsider and someone who wanted to topple the status quo in Washington, D.C. and enact change in the beltway to better serve the people. Many believe President Bush failed at that. I believe President Obama, like his predecessor just did the same thing. He had an enormous historical and political opportunity in the wake of a terrible economy to force the change he proclaimed. Instead, it seems to me the economic stimulus package could be his Iraq War.
As time passes, the cost and failure of this bill will become more apparent and the president may have no choice but to go and attempt to throw more money and legislation at the problem much like President Bush had to throw more money and troops in the Middle East. In both cases, similarities abound. Both seemed rushed actions with little attention to details. Both seemed haphazzardly created without much thought to actual functionality, cost and exit strategy. Both seemed more influenced by those around the president than the president himself. Both actions seemed to benefit people and concerns already profiting from the system. In the end, it seems the people, for whom each man and each Congress serve, failed to take care of basics–the people.
Have a story or topic you feel is not getting coverage in the mainstream media? Let us know!
Reach us at editor@kingnewsmedia.com